Name | D |
Origin | University of California, Berkeley |
Status | Actively developed and used |
Purpose | Systems programming, scientific computing, high-performance applications |
Adoption | Niche but loyal following |
Designed as | Safer and more productive alternative to C and Fortran |
Development started | Late 1970s |
D is a statically-typed, systems programming language that was originally developed at the University of California, Berkeley in the late 1970s. Conceived as a safer and more productive alternative to popular systems languages like C and Fortran, D has carved out a significant niche in fields such as scientific computing, high-performance computing, and systems programming.
D was first conceived in the mid-1970s by a team of researchers at UC Berkeley, led by John Ousterhout, David Patterson, and Carlo Sequin. Seeking to address perceived shortcomings in existing systems programming languages, the team set out to create a new language that would combine the low-level control and performance of C with improved safety, concurrency support, and developer productivity.
The researchers drew inspiration from a variety of sources, including Pascal, Modula-2, and the emerging ideas around object-oriented programming. After several years of prototyping and refinement, the first stable version of D was released in 1982.
At its core, D was designed to provide systems-level control and performance, with a greater emphasis on safety and programmer convenience than traditional systems languages. Some of D's key features include:
While D has never achieved the same level of widespread adoption as some other systems programming languages, it has maintained a dedicated following, particularly in specialized computing domains. Some of the key areas where D is used include:
While D was not directly inspired by or derived from any single existing language, it has drawn comparisons to and influenced the development of other systems programming languages. For example, D's focus on safety and concurrency has been echoed in the design of newer languages like Rust and Go. Conversely, D has itself been influenced by innovations in languages like C++, Java, and Python.
Despite never reaching the same level of ubiquity as some of its more famous counterparts, D has still managed to leave a lasting impact on the field of systems programming. The language's emphasis on safety, performance, and developer productivity has helped raise the bar for what users expect from modern systems languages.
Moreover, D's unique blend of low-level control and higher-level features has inspired ongoing research and experimentation in programming language design. Its influence can be seen in the evolution of languages like C++ and the development of newer systems programming languages that seek to balance power and productivity.
Today, D continues to be actively developed and maintained, with a dedicated community of users and contributors. While it may never challenge the dominance of C or Fortran, D's legacy as a pioneering effort to rethink systems programming will likely continue to be felt in the years to come.